Physical Servers vs Virtual Machines: Understanding the Differences and Similarities

In the world of IT infrastructure, two popular options for hosting applications and data are physical servers and virtual machines. Both have their own advantages and disadvantages, and choosing between the two can be a tough decision. In this blog post, we’ll dive into the key differences and similarities between physical servers and virtual machines to help you make an informed decision. In short this write-up is all about Physical Servers vs Virtual Machines.

What is a Physical Server In Simple Terms?

A physical server is a standalone computing device that provides computing resources, storage, and network connectivity to support the operation of one or more applications and services. It is a dedicated hardware device that operates independently of other devices and operates directly on physical hardware components, such as the central processing unit (CPU), memory, and storage. Physical servers are typically housed in a data center or server room and can be managed on-premise or remotely by an IT professional. They are often used in large organizations and enterprise-level environments, where a high level of performance, reliability, and security is required.

What is a Virtual Machine (VM) In Simple Terms?

A virtual machine (VM) is a software-based emulation of a computer system that runs on top of a physical server. It acts like a separate physical machine, with its own operating system, applications, and data, even though it shares the physical resources of the underlying physical server. Virtual machines are created and managed by virtualization software, such as VMware, VirtualBox, or Hyper-V, which creates a virtualized environment for each individual VM. This allows multiple virtual machines to run on a single physical server, making it a cost-effective and flexible solution for hosting multiple applications and services.

Virtual machines are often used in cloud computing environments, where businesses can rent virtual machines from a cloud provider and use them for a variety of purposes, such as hosting web applications, databases, or testing and development environments. They can also be used in small to medium-sized businesses and organizations, where physical hardware limitations or cost considerations make it difficult to deploy multiple physical servers.

Also Read: Best 5 Linux Web Hosting Service Provider of 2023: A Comprehensive Guide

Detail Comparison Between Physical Servers and Virtual Machines

When comparing physical servers and virtual machines, there are several key differences and similarities to consider, including:

1. Management

Management is another important factor to consider when comparing physical servers and virtual machines. Both physical servers and virtual machines can be managed by IT professionals, but the level of management required and the management tools available can vary depending on the type of solution.

• Physical servers typically require more hands-on management, as they are standalone devices that operate independently of other devices. This includes tasks such as updating the operating system, patching security vulnerabilities, and monitoring performance. IT professionals must also physically access the server in order to make any hardware upgrades or repairs.
• Virtual machines, on the other hand, are managed by virtualization software, which provides a centralized management interface for creating, configuring, and managing virtual machines. This makes it easier for IT professionals to manage multiple virtual machines from a single interface, without the need for physical access to each individual machine. Virtualization software also provides features such as snapshots, which allow administrators to quickly revert to a previous state of the virtual machine in the event of a problem.

In terms of ease of management, virtual machines offer greater convenience and efficiency compared to physical servers, as they can be managed remotely and provide a centralized management interface. However, the level of management required for virtual machines can still be complex and time-consuming, especially in large-scale environments with multiple virtual machines.

2. Performance

• Performance is one of the key factors to consider when comparing physical servers and virtual machines. Physical servers offer better performance compared to virtual machines, since they have direct access to the physical resources of the underlying hardware. This includes the CPU, memory, and storage, which are not shared with other virtual machines. This results in a higher level of performance and faster processing times.
• Virtual machines, on the other hand, may experience some performance degradation due to the overhead of virtualization and the shared nature of the underlying hardware. The virtualization software must translate the requests from the virtual machine to the physical resources, which can result in some latency and decreased performance.

It’s important to note that virtual machines can be optimized for performance by allocating more resources, such as CPU, memory, and storage, and by using high-performance storage options, such as solid-state drives (SSDs). However, this can also increase the cost of the virtual machine and may still not match the level of performance offered by a physical server.

Also Read: Understand the Importance of a Network Operation Center (NOC); Step By Step Guide

3. Portability

Portability is another factor to consider when comparing physical servers and virtual machines. Virtual machines offer greater portability compared to physical servers, as they can be easily moved, copied, or deleted without affecting the underlying hardware.

• Physical servers, on the other hand, are more difficult to move and reconfigure, as they are standalone devices that must be physically transported to a new location. This can be time-consuming and expensive, especially if the physical server contains sensitive data that must be securely transported.
• Virtual machines can be easily exported and imported to different physical servers, allowing them to be moved between data centers, cloud environments, or even personal computers. This makes it easier to respond to changing needs and allows virtual machines to be easily duplicated for testing and development purposes.

In terms of portability, virtual machines offer greater flexibility and ease of use compared to physical servers, as they can be easily moved and duplicated as needed. This makes them well suited for organizations that require the ability to quickly respond to changing needs and that need to move their applications and data to different locations.

4. Scalability

Scalability is another important factor to consider when comparing physical servers and virtual machines. Both physical servers and virtual machines can be scalable, but the methods and tools used to scale each solution can vary.

• Physical servers can be scaled by adding additional hardware, such as more memory or storage, or by adding additional servers to create a cluster or load-balancing configuration. This provides a scalable solution for organizations that require a high level of performance and that need to handle a large amount of data and processing.
• Virtual machines can be scaled by adding more virtual machines, allocating additional resources, or by using load balancing and clustering configurations. This allows organizations to easily scale their applications and services without the need to add additional hardware. Virtual machines can also be scaled dynamically in response to changes in demand, making them well suited for cloud-based environments that need to respond to fluctuations in resource utilization.

In terms of scalability, both physical servers and virtual machines offer flexible solutions that can be scaled to meet the changing needs of an organization. The choice between the two will depend on the specific scalability requirements of the organization, as well as the available budget and resources.

It’s important to note that virtual machines can provide a more cost-effective and flexible scalability solution compared to physical servers, especially in cloud-based environments where additional resources can be easily provisioned on-demand. However, physical servers may offer better performance and scalability in certain applications and services that require a high level of performance and that cannot be effectively scaled using virtual machines.

Must Read: Understanding the Importance of a Security Operation Center (SOC)

5. Capacity management

Capacity management is a critical aspect of managing both physical servers and virtual machines, as it involves ensuring that the available resources are used efficiently and that the organization can meet its performance requirements.

• Physical servers offer a fixed amount of resources, such as memory and storage, that must be managed effectively to ensure that the server can handle the demands of the applications and services running on it. IT professionals must closely monitor the utilization of these resources and make hardware upgrades as needed to ensure that the server can continue to perform optimally.
• Virtual machines, on the other hand, can be dynamically allocated and deallocated resources as needed, making it easier to manage capacity and respond to changes in demand. Virtualization software provides tools and features that allow IT professionals to monitor and manage the utilization of resources, such as memory and storage, to ensure that the virtual machines have the resources they need to perform effectively.

In terms of capacity management, virtual machines offer greater flexibility and ease of use compared to physical servers, as they can be dynamically allocated and deallocated resources as needed. This makes them well suited for organizations that require the ability to respond quickly to changes in demand and that need to manage their resources effectively.

However, it’s important to note that virtual machines still require careful management of resources, as overloading virtual machines with too many resources can lead to performance degradation and other issues. In addition, virtual machines may require additional resources, such as network and storage, to ensure that they can perform optimally. A thorough evaluation of the capacity management requirements and available resources is recommended to determine the best solution for your business.

6. System recovery

System recovery is an important consideration when comparing physical servers and virtual machines, as it involves ensuring that the data and applications running on the server can be quickly and easily restored in the event of a failure or disaster.

• Physical servers typically require manual intervention to restore data and applications, as the data must be manually backed up and restored to the server. This process can be time-consuming and complex, especially if the physical server contains large amounts of data or if the failure is caused by a hardware issue.
• Virtual machines, on the other hand, offer greater flexibility and ease of use when it comes to system recovery, as virtualization software provides tools and features for quickly and easily backing up and restoring virtual machines. Virtual machines can be backed up to an external storage device or to a cloud environment, and the virtualization software can be used to quickly restore the virtual machine to its previous state in the event of a failure.

In terms of system recovery, virtual machines offer greater flexibility and ease of use compared to physical servers, as they can be quickly and easily backed up and restored using virtualization software. This makes virtual machines well suited for organizations that require a high level of data protection and that need to ensure that their applications and data can be quickly restored in the event of a failure or disaster.

It’s important to note that both physical servers and virtual machines require regular backups and disaster recovery planning to ensure that data and applications can be quickly and easily restored in the event of a failure. A comprehensive disaster recovery plan that includes regular backups and testing of recovery procedures is recommended for all organizations.

Also Read: The Top 5 Best Dedicated Server Hosting Providers in India

7. Business continuity

Business continuity is a critical factor to consider when comparing physical servers and virtual machines, as it involves ensuring that the organization can continue to operate and meet its business objectives in the event of a failure or disaster.

• Physical servers can provide a high level of business continuity, especially if they are properly configured and maintained. For example, a server with redundant components, such as multiple power supplies and disk drives, can provide a high level of availability and minimize downtime in the event of a failure.
• Virtual machines also provide a high level of business continuity, as virtualization software provides tools and features for quickly and easily backing up and restoring virtual machines in the event of a failure or disaster. Virtual machines can also be deployed across multiple physical servers, providing greater availability and minimizing downtime in the event of a failure.

In terms of business continuity, both physical servers and virtual machines offer benefits and can provide a high level of availability, depending on the configuration and management of the solution. It’s important to assess the business continuity requirements of the organization and to plan and implement a solution that meets those requirements. This may involve deploying multiple physical servers, deploying virtual machines across multiple physical servers, or implementing a combination of physical servers and virtual machines.

It’s also important to regularly test and update business continuity plans to ensure that the organization is prepared to respond to a failure or disaster and to ensure that the solution can meet the evolving business continuity requirements of the organization. A comprehensive business continuity plan that includes regular testing and updating of procedures is recommended for all organizations.

8. Security

Security is a critical factor to consider when comparing physical servers and virtual machines, as it involves ensuring that the data and applications running on the server are protected from unauthorized access and malicious threats.

• Physical servers offer a high level of security, as the server is physically located in a secure environment and can be secured using physical access controls, such as locks and security cameras. Physical servers can also be secured using traditional security measures, such as firewalls, intrusion detection systems, and antivirus software.
• Virtual machines also offer a high level of security, as virtualization software provides tools and features for securing virtual machines, such as network isolation, encryption, and access controls. Virtual machines can also be secured using traditional security measures, such as firewalls, intrusion detection systems, and antivirus software.

In terms of security, both physical servers and virtual machines offer benefits and can provide a high level of security, depending on the configuration and management of the solution. It’s important to assess the security requirements of the organization and to plan and implement a solution that meets those requirements. This may involve deploying physical servers in a secure environment, deploying virtual machines with network isolation and encryption, or implementing a combination of physical servers and virtual machines.

It’s also important to regularly update and test security measures to ensure that the solution is secure and that the organization can respond effectively to changing security threats. A comprehensive security plan that includes regular testing and updating of security measures is recommended for all organizations.

9. Costs

Costs is an important factor to consider when comparing physical servers and virtual machines, as it involves evaluating the financial implications of deploying and maintaining each solution.

• Physical servers can be relatively expensive to deploy and maintain, as they require specialized hardware, software licenses, and ongoing maintenance costs, such as hardware upgrades, repairs, and energy costs. In addition, physical servers may require additional hardware, such as storage devices and network equipment, to support the organization’s applications and data.
• Virtual machines are typically less expensive to deploy and maintain compared to physical servers, as they run on a single physical server and share resources, such as storage and processing power, with other virtual machines. This can result in reduced hardware costs, software licenses, and energy costs, as well as lower maintenance costs, as virtual machines can be quickly and easily deployed, configured, and maintained using virtualization software.

In terms of costs, virtual machines can be a more cost-effective solution compared to physical servers, as they offer reduced hardware and software costs and lower ongoing maintenance costs. However, it’s important to assess the specific requirements of the organization and to evaluate the costs of deploying and maintaining both physical servers and virtual machines, as the costs of each solution can vary depending on the configuration and management of the solution.

Must Read: How to Backup OneDrive for Business: A Comprehensive Step By Step Guide

Which One to Choose From Physical Servers vs Virtual Machines?

The decision of whether to choose physical servers or virtual machines depends on the specific requirements and objectives of the organization.

If the organization has specific requirements for high performance and low latency, such as for applications that require direct access to hardware resources, physical servers may be the best option. Physical servers also provide a high level of control and visibility over the underlying hardware, which can be important for certain applications and data.

If the organization is looking for a cost-effective solution with lower deployment and maintenance costs, and does not have specific requirements for high performance and low latency, virtual machines may be the best option. Virtual machines offer the ability to share resources and run multiple operating systems on a single physical server, which can result in reduced hardware and software costs and lower ongoing maintenance costs.

Here is the a Short Table Comparison;  Physical Servers vs Virtual Machines

It’s important to carefully assess the specific requirements of the organization and to consider factors such as performance, management, portability, scalability, capacity management, system recovery, business continuity, security, and costs when making the decision.

In many cases, organizations may choose to deploy a combination of physical servers and virtual machines, depending on the specific requirements of the organization and the applications and data being supported. A comprehensive assessment of the organization’s requirements and a thorough evaluation of the costs and benefits of both physical servers and virtual machines can help organizations make informed decisions about the best solution for their needs.

Must Read: Office 365 Ransomware Protection & Recovery: A Complete Step By Step Guide

Conclusion

Both physical servers and virtual machines have their own unique advantages and disadvantages. Physical servers offer a higher level of performance, but can be more expensive and less flexible. On the other hand, virtual machines offer increased flexibility and cost-effectiveness, but may have lower performance compared to physical servers. The choice between the two ultimately comes down to your specific business needs, and a thorough evaluation of your IT infrastructure requirements is recommended to make an informed decision.

Some popular hosting providers for virtual machines include Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud Platform, and BigRock. For physical servers, some popular options include OVH, Hetzner, IBM Cloud, and Hostinger. It’s important to do your research and compare different hosting providers to find the one that best fits your needs.